Plan that Trump and Putin had agreed upon long before Trump’s inauguration and swiftly began implementing right after it

Reconstruction of the plan based on traces in the sand - 2

I found some time to gather the steps taken by the Trump administration, the Kremlin, the EU, the UK, and the Office of the President to reconstruct the plan that Trump and Putin had agreed upon long before Trump’s inauguration and swiftly began implementing right after it. Naturally, each acted through their own measures. For those who struggle to control their emotions, it’s better to skip to the last paragraph.

Trump’s true goal was to establish cooperation with the Kremlin before entering a harsh trade and political war between the U.S. and China, which could begin as early as 2027. Putin’s real objective was the destruction of the U.S. and the complete takeover of Europe, proclaiming himself Tsar-Emperor. However, Putin declared to Trump his willingness to engage in an open conflict with China and outlined his own demands. If Trump met them, Putin would once again become Washington’s best friend and partner and an enemy of Beijing.

The conditions were simple and had been voiced multiple times by Kremlin officials: the elimination of the Ukrainian state and the Kremlin’s control over the political landscape of Eastern European countries. Based on numerous indications, it is now evident that Trump accepted these terms on the condition of joint exploitation of rare earth metal deposits by American and Russian companies on Russian and Ukrainian territory—something Putin also agreed to. The parties reached a consensus on their shared objectives, the timeline for achieving them, and the set of actions required from each side.

Where are we now? We are witnessing the implementation of the agreed-upon joint action plan between the U.S. and Russia at the stage where Zelensky has already realized what Trump is demanding him to sign and is looking for ways to avoid it. At this stage of the plan, Europe and the UK are also supposed to start panicking, correctly understanding their situation and beginning to support Ukraine by all possible means.

It is clear that, according to the plan, the parties need to hand over the Ukrainian state under the Kremlin’s political control. This is precisely why Trump is screaming about peace, fallen soldiers, and church domes, demanding that Ukraine cease fire and hold elections without any security guarantees, using only threats and coercion—no incentives or rewards.

It is also clear that, once gaining control over Ukraine’s political landscape, Putin will throw his army, along with forcibly mobilized Ukrainians, further west, demanding that Czechs, Poles, Romanians, Estonians, Latvians, and Lithuanians submit to his terms and elect “3D copies of Orbán and Fico” as their leaders. Along the way, the parties will have to dismantle NATO and the European Union (and possibly even the UN), as there is no place for them in the new “European security system”—but these are just technical details.

As part of the division of roles, Trump is responsible for delivering Ukraine in a state ready to sign a “peace deal based on the Istanbul agreements” and ensuring the announcement of Ukraine’s presidential elections. If Ukraine resists, hoping for European support, the parties have already prepared a series of joint steps to intimidate Europe with nuclear strikes and accusations of provoking “World War III.”

So, what should we expect from these shady “talks” in Saudi Arabia? The best possible outcome there is if Sybiha signs something just for the sake of formality! And even then, it would be nothing more than a temporary piece of paper, mainly meant to prevent another public scandal between Zelensky and Trump.

The real question isn’t whether Trump can be trusted when he demands signatures and assures that Putin won’t violate a ceasefire agreement. The real question is: What should Ukraine do in this situation? And then—how exactly should it do it?

For Ukraine, the most crucial task is to prevent illusions in the minds of Scholz, Starmer, Macron, Duda, and Pavel. At the very least, these leaders must open their eyes and realize where the U.S. and Russia are leading them. Only once they accept that Europe’s situation is exactly as it is—not some softened version—can real discussions begin about possible joint actions of Europe aimed at destroying this plan of the “enemy and traitor” and options for imposing our own game.

And, by the way, the Habsburgs have already outlined the framework for this European game: the liberation of nations enslaved by Moscow and their right to independent statehood.

Ukraine must support this European strategy with all its resources.

Vladislav Olenchenko

Ukraine Front Lines