ANALYTICS

Istanbul talks: Choice between war and dishonor

Everyone knows Churchill’s quote: “You were given the choice between war and dishonor. You chose dishonor and you will have war.” It seems that Ukraine is going to break a record, and having no choice, but a full-fledged war, and the war that is far from being lost, wants to voluntarily choose dishonor in addition to this war.

The terms of peace announced by Mykhailo Podoliak, Davyd Arahamiya and Chaly on March 29, 2022 in Istanbul are the de facto terms of our capitulation, for which there is no basis in view of the military situation.

This is a “hybrid” peace that gives Russia everything it needs, except the “maximum” program, i.e. total control over Ukraine.

Instead, Russia receives de facto recognition of the occupation of Crimea and Donbas and guarantees that we will not even try to liberate them, our non-aligned status (i.e. our rejection of the chance to receive protection under the Atlantic Charter), and most importantly, Russia gets the lifting of sanctions.

In turn, the lifting of sanctions means the survival and impunity of the Putin regime, which is already bursting at the seams, and due to the military defeat in Ukraine and the preservation of sanctions is unlikely to last long. Instead, left unpunished, it will return to carrying out its program of gathering together the “lost lands of the Empire.”

The bottom line here is that although an enormous price has been paid in human lives, economical damage, millions of refugees, and destroyed cities, we return to the situation as of February 23, 2022.

And the Russian Federation also returns to the situation as of February 23, 2022 in terms of “punishment” for its aggression. Besides, it gets the opportunity to work quietly on error correction and prepare for a new aggression, during which to implement its “maximum” program,” i.e. the final solution to the Ukrainian question” (c).

So the “peace” they allegedly have agreed on in Istanbul is both morally shameful, military unjustifiable, and apparently suicidal in the medium term.

To allow such peace is the same as voluntarily surrendering to the Putin regime, with all the consequences.

Our real choice is not between a shameful pseudo-peace and war, but between a very difficult but victorious war today, and an even more difficult and likely lost war in the near future. I hope we will not make a mistake in this choice.

Glory to Ukraine.

Evgen Dykyj.

Ukraine Front Lines

Tags:
Zara Hanova

Recent Posts

Negotiations with the Russian Federation must take place in the presence of international partners so that Putin cannot distort Ukraine’s position – Ohryzko

Former Foreign Minister Volodymyr Ohryzko believes that international partners must be present at any negotiations…

3 hours ago

Support the fundraiser for vehicle repairs and the purchase of components for Ukrainian drones

Our colleagues at Ukraine News UP have launched a fundraiser to repair and purchase components…

5 hours ago

Germany says Russia needs to respond to ceasefire in Ukraine offer by end day or face sanctions

Germany says Russia needs to respond to ceasefire offer by end day or face sanctions.…

6 hours ago

Russia – Ukraine war updates as of May 12, 2025

Russia – Ukraine war latest updates from the General Staff of Ukraine as of May…

11 hours ago

Putin’s ultimatum: a call for global clarity and Ukrainian resolve

Putin chose war and issued ultimatums to the world. Putin's statement: what conclusions should the…

1 day ago

The rise of the European Shield: a new security alliance for the 21st century

It looks like we might soon witness the emergence of a “European Shield.” Today's visit…

1 day ago